Friday, 29 May 2015

The College Of Not-Actually-Teaching

This reel is not serving its original purpose.

The College Of Not-Actually-Teaching

An article in the Independent yesterday reported that:
Mr Laws [the schools minister] said funding for a Royal College of Teaching
would be announced before the election, to put teaching on an equal footing with professions 
such as law and medicine. “This has the potential to finally give the teaching profession
the recognition, respect and high status it deserves,” he said.
It has always been a likely prospect that clueless, but publicity-hungry, politicians would be making announcements about this in the run up to the election, although there is some irony
that that plans to subsidise the education establishment were announced in an article
claiming that Michael Gove still had lots of influence over education policy.
I’ve argued repeatedly against the latest plans for a College of Teaching, largely on the basis that they are plans for a body that non-teachers can join which would, nevertheless, seek to speak
for or even regulate, the profession. The latest plans seem to have been built around the idea
that any group currently involved in CPD, including trade unions and at least one private company, should be involved in the initial structure, and that any recognition of current practising teachers should be put off for at least 4 years and only apply to some subsection of teachers
approved by those setting the organisation up.
There are several reasons such an organisation cannot be trusted to spend money intended
for the professional development of teachers.

1) The College of Teaching needs to be free to argue for, and organise, changes
in how professional development for teachers is provided even if that does not fit the agenda
of those already involved in the CPD industry. That cannot happen if the organisation
is full of appointees of current vested interests. The involvement of SSAT, a private company providing CPD, is particularly suspect. Imagine if a pharmaceutical company had set up
the Royal Society of Medicine. This is not an independent body.

2) The College of Teaching needs to be able to speak for those actually teaching in schools
and colleges. It is that lack of power and a voice from the frontline that has deprofessionalised us. If the membership is dominated by educationalists, consultants and non-teaching headteachers
it will do the exact opposite of what it is meant to do. It will reinforce our powerlessness.

3) The model of professional development being put forward is one that, I believe, many teachers will object to. It is currently being suggested that teachers be assessed and classified as associates, chartered members, or fellows. This is the old model, where teachers were considered experts depending on where their game playing had got them, i.e their position as managers, ASTs, or even as “outstanding/good/requires improvement/inadequate” teachers
based on their latest appraisal. This is not what teacher expertise looks like.
We should be recognised for our different types of expertise in different areas, not ranked.
The only teachers who would join an organisation dedicated to saying that one teacher
is a better teacher than another, are those who think they are better than their peers,
or who are chasing promotions or other opportunities to teach less.
It will have no appeal to those who actually just want to get better at teaching.
And this problem would have been utterly obvious if the movement to set up
a College Of Teaching had been teacher-led, not led by vested interests.
Of course, without public subsidy or a means to coerce teachers to join, this organisation
will get nowhere in its present form. But if politicians are looking for the appearance of supporting teachers without any of the substance, they are going to throw money at this.
So let’s be ready to say loudly and publicly that money paid to the proposed College Of Teaching is money spent undermining, not supporting, the teaching profession.
Let politicians know they will face difficult questions if they throw public money
at this proposed quango and then claim they are doing something for teachers.

Introduction to Turbo Charged Reading YouTube
A practical overview of Turbo Charged Reading YouTube 
How to choose a book. A Turbo Charged Reading YouTube
Emotions when Turbo Charged Reading YouTube
Advanced Reading Skills Perhaps you’d like to join my FaceBook group ?
Perhaps you’d like to check out my sister blogs:         gives many ways for you to work with the stresses of life               which takes advantage of the experience and expertise of others.         just for fun.

To quote the Dr Seuss himself, “The more that you read, the more things you will know.
The more that you learn; the more places you'll go.”

No comments:

Post a Comment

Your opinions, experience and questions are welcome. M'reen