Perennial cornflower and pollinator.
Why
Standards-Based Teaching Has Failed to Raise Reading Achievement
Standards-based educational reform
goes back to the early 1990s.
Since then, test
scores have see-sawed a bit, but for the most part we are doing about as well
as we’ve been
doing since 1970 (when we first started collecting national reading data).
That means standards-based reform has
not led to higher achievement. Establishing educational goals and aligning
teaching to those goals to ensure kids succeed has not happened.
Diane Ravitch, and others who don’t
spend much time in schools, claim to know why standards have failed. They
believe that if teachers were just left to their own devices,
American kids
would excel in school.
Unlike them, I’ve spent much time in
classrooms and working with kids
over the past
four decades or so…as teacher, lunch room supervisor, park supervisor,
student teacher,
tutor, researcher, remediator, teacher educator, observer, evaluator,
school
administrator, textbook author, test designer, parent, grandparent, and uncle.
My take on the problem is different,
but I do agree that it is a problem.
I have come to believe that standards-based
reform will NEVER work unless educators
come to
understand the idea of standards-based teaching, something that has not
happened
during the past
25 years.
To illustrate my point, I received the
following two notes from teachers last week:
I teach 4th
grade in a Daily 5/Cafe school. We have NO curriculum or requirements
other than...
2 mini
lessons, conferring individually and maintaining strategy groups with students.
Do you have
any advice or thoughts on the organizing and planning within these four
areas?
I am working
on a district committee that is developing a universal literacy framework
for our
elementary schools. One of the recommended components is shared reading,
which is not
currently a formalized daily practice at our highest-achieving schools.
Is there an
argument, based on research, for this component to be mandated for all
classrooms
as part of an
excellent literacy program? The research that I have found seems to mainly
focus
on
pre-schoolers.
What sense do I make of these queries? They reveal that their schools
are dedicated
to promoting
particular activities and practices—not to teaching children.
There are
particular activities these principals and teachers want to see in classrooms,
and they
are not
particular focused on what they are supposed to be engaged in: teaching
children to read.
Instead of focusing like-a-laser on
what they want kids to know, to be able to do, to be,
they are
promoting favorite classroom activities. Instead of thinking about how to get
kids
to a particular
outcome, they are wondering if they can somehow align the required activities
with useful
outcomes. It would be like a surgeon deciding what kind of surgery
he wanted to
conduct and then hoping to stretch it to the patient’s needs
(“Sorry Mr.
Jones. I know you have prostate cancer, but I like to do hysterectomies.”)
Until we actually focus on teaching the
standards—that is, until we decide that our job
is to ensure
that kids learn what we have agreed to teach them—then it will continue to look
like
our kids are
failing. (And, no, “test prep” is not teaching to our standards, it is just one
more example of educators focusing on particular activities rather than on
reaching particular outcomes).
Shanahan on Literacy http://www.shanahanonliteracy.com/
Introduction to Turbo Charged Reading YouTube
A practical overview of Turbo
Charged Reading YouTube
How to choose a book. A Turbo Charged Reading YouTube
Emotions when Turbo Charged Reading YouTube
Advanced Reading Skills Perhaps you’d like to join my FaceBook
group ?
Perhaps you’d like to check out my sister blogs:
www.innermindworking.blogspot.com
gives many ways for you to work with the stresses of life
www.ourinnerminds.blogspot.com which takes
advantage of the experience and expertise of others.
www.happyartaccidents.blogspot.com just for fun.
To quote the Dr Seuss himself, “The more that you read, the more
things you will know.
The more that you learn; the more places you'll go.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your opinions, experience and questions are welcome. M'reen