Wednesday, 16 September 2015

The Trendiest Current Arguments For Progressive Education Part 1

Broom, now I wonder did they makes brooms from this bush? I think not.
I've just read that this is Radiate broom
and that there are pollen rich grasses called Hairy and Upright Brome.
But then again, brome and broom are the same to my dyslexic self. :)

The Trendiest Current Arguments For Progressive Education Part 1

One of the best analyses of progressive education is “The Crisis in Education” by Hannah Arendt.
An online copy can be found here and you should read it. It was written in the early 60s,
and as well as analysing the progressive movements of the time, it made the following prediction about the chances of reversing the progressive tide in education:
…wherever the crisis has occurred in the modern world, one cannot simply go on
nor yet simply turn back. Such a reversal will never bring us anywhere except to the same situation out of which the crisis has just arisen. The return would simply be a repeat performance
–though perhaps different in form, since there are no limits to the possibilities of nonsense
and capricious notions that can be decked out as the last word in science.
While not every movement towards progressive education that has occurred since then
has claimed to be scientific, very many have; but the point that progressive education
will keep reappearing has been spot on. Many of the arguments for it are fairly timeless.
Technology is always about to make traditional education obsolete.
Schools (despite the influence of the last progressive invasion) are always presented as
an out-of-date product of a past era (usually the 19th century, sometimes the 50s,
occasionally Roman times or something similarly exotic). Another country is always showing us
the way with their latest experiment in project-based learning or discovery learning.
There is always some list of aims of education that go far beyond the academic. 
However, some arguments appear for a time, then fall out of favour.
For instance, only the most behind-the-times progressive would argue that we need
more progressive education to satisfy kinesthetic learners,
or to enable girls to compete academically with boys.
In this post and tomorrow’s, I aim to mention some of the arguments for progressive education
I have been seeing lately (mainly in blogs) that I don’t remember seeing much of 10 years ago.
I didn’t note them down when I saw them, and it is only as they are repeated
that they’ve made an impression, so I’m not able to conveniently link to examples and,
no doubt, somebody will accuse me of creating straw men. At the very least, if I mention them
we can all watch out for them and see them in the context of an attempt to present an ideology
of teaching from over 100 years ago as a novel response to contemporary concerns.

1)      The Argument from Mental Health. I don’t want to dismiss concern about children’s
mental health, although I am, as ever, sceptical when medically unqualified adults
claim to be able to make amateur diagnoses of medical conditions
in other people’s children. The access (or lack if it) to mental health services for children
is an important issue and we should take mental health seriously.
However, I have seen increasing attempts to blur the line between
actual mental health issues, and any kind of emotional discomfort for children.
I have seen bullying described as a mental health issue.
I have seen people take the leap from concern about mental health, to the importance
of “wellbeing” , or “resilience” as an aim of schooling and then to a downplaying
of the academic purpose of schooling, or the need for knowledge.
Most commonly though, I have seen “stress” and “anxiety” join “self-esteem” as an argument against various traditional practices, from strict discipline to setting exams. 
Indeed, the idea that children are traumatised by exams seems particularly popular
at the moment, often tied to the bizarre claim that the amount of exams
children sit is being increased by politicians.
There are two key assumptions in the mental health argument.
The first is that teachers should absorb ever more responsibility for other people’s children, effectively usurping parents. This is then combined with the assumption that the liberal,
middle class parent who is concerned only about their child’s day-to-day happiness and autonomy, rather than their long-term interests, will have children with better mental health.
As I am fond of quoting, R.S. Peters described the first assumption
as the idea that schools should be “orphanages for children with parents”
and can be best challenged by a defence of the rights of parents to raise their own children.
As for the second assumption, it’s a debate that I can’t really go into here too much,
but it is highly dubious and worth considering in the light of the attitudes of different cultures. 
Despite the claims of progressives, it is not the most authoritarian countries
that have the highest youth suicide rates, nor is it obvious that those raised by liberal parents
are beacons of good mental health in their youth or later.

2)      Debate Denialism. The argument between traditional and progressive education are ancient
(a case can be made that they date back to at least Plato) and have been expressed
in those terms, i.e. “traditional” and “progressive”, for at least 100 years.
There are good arguments that “traditional”, “progressive” and other terms
like “child-centred” are misleading, and what they stand for can change over time.
However, they have been the standard terms for the debate over many decades
and represent real divides.  In the period between 2001 and 2010 when the traditional side was largely suppressed, many progressives thought the debate was over and they had won. 
It came as a shock to the system for many that values that were unopposed
for almost a decade were once more being challenged in public.
One of the responses has been to simply deny that the debate exists and, therefore,
the “progressive” domination of state education is a myth and so any challenge
to it can be dismissed. So we see people claim that terms like “progressive” and “traditional” are meaningless; that this debate is stale and irrelevant, or that “progressive” is an insult 
and should not be used to describe people who champion the ideas that, historically,
were described in that way. Progressives have always been coy about the history
of their ideas, invariably the old dogmas are presented as new innovations,
but this takes it to a new level by denying that the argument about their ideas ever existed.
Of course, there is something absurd about the idea that the language that allows us
to distinguish between different values and methods in education should be discontinued
or that the debate is over. There are variations of that idea used to make it more plausible. Sometimes it is combined with the suggestion that the words only apply to teaching methods,
not the values we use to choose between teaching methods. This means that one can claim
to use a mix of methods, or observe that most teachers use a mix of methods, and then can claim
to be neither “progressive” nor “traditional” ignoring the philosophies that guide how we choose
our mix. Sometimes it is combined with talk of evidence and “what works”
as if we can judge this in the absence of a view about what we are trying to achieve.
Perhaps there can be confused positions; progressives do go through periods of claiming
that their methods are the best ways of achieving traditional, academic ends
(periods that usually end when promised improvements in academic performance
don’t materialise). But if one cannot identify clear and genuine disagreements
between those in the traditional and those in the progressive camp,
then one simply needs to read up. Perhaps “Left Back – A Century of Failed School Reforms”
by Diane Ravitch might be a good place to start.

You can TCR software and engineering manuals for spontaneously recall – or pass that exam.
I can Turbo Charge Read a novel 6-7 times faster and remember what I’ve read.
I can TCR an instructional/academic book around 20 times faster and remember what I’ve read.
Introduction to Turbo Charged Reading YouTube
A practical overview of Turbo Charged Reading YouTube  
How to choose a book. A Turbo Charged Reading YouTube
Emotions when Turbo Charged Reading YouTube

Advanced Reading Skills Perhaps you’d like to join my FaceBook group ?

Perhaps you’d like to check out my sister blogs:        gives many ways for you to work with the stresses of life             take advantage of business experience and expertise.       just for fun.

To quote the Dr Seuss himself, “The more that you read, the more things you will know.
The more that you learn; the more places you'll go.”

No comments:

Post a Comment

Your opinions, experience and questions are welcome. M'reen