Tuesday, 22 September 2015

The Trendiest Current Arguments For Progressive Education Part 2

Horsetails were the trees of their day!

 The Trendiest Current Arguments For Progressive Education Part 2

Yesterday, I began writing about some of the ways I’ve seen people justifying progressive education recently. Here are the other two ways.

3) The Argument from Political Correctness. The last year or so has seen a real resurgence
of a type of left-wing politics that was common in the 80s and went out of fashion in the mid 90s.
We used to call it “political correctness” back then, and it largely consisted of
accusing unsuspecting, and often entirely innocent people of racism, sexism and homophobia. Often it was for not using the latest terminology; sometimes it was for not having
the right politics, and at other times it seemed entirely arbitrary.

If you are not familiar with the 80s version there are some great examples in the video below
(“Anti-Racist Maths” being my personal favourite):

This is an old film but it graphically shows the insanity that happens eventually whenever a left wing government take control. Despite the fact that most of them are now thankfully long gone, 
many of them like Neil Kinnock remain and have very cushy jobs at the European Union 
where they have continued working for their Marxist agenda practically unnoticed.

The newer version is, so far, more of a presence in universities than in schools,
but it is being pushed by some education researchers and EAL “experts”.
The basic idea is still that of thought-crime, condemning people for prejudices
that they have never openly expressed or obviously acted on, but that they can be assumed
to have on the basis of being white, male or straight. In the 80s version, “black”
became the general term for all possible victims of racism (even, say, the Irish or Jews).
In the more recent version “white” has become the general term for people
who aren’t assumed to be victims of racism. But the effect is the same, you are either oppressor 
or oppressed and if you are in the wrong category then no matter how good your argument is,
or how much the evidence supports your case, expressing your opinion or getting your way
in any matter that also involves people who aren’t classed as white is an oppressive
use of “privilege”.  This becomes an argument for progressive education where it is applied
to the curriculum. A curriculum can be condemned as “white” if it passes on knowledge
and ideas valued in British or European culture. The suggested replacement curriculum
can be built around political indoctrination, or teaching obscure,
but politically approved, knowledge. However, in the most obviously progressive version,
the attack on a “white curriculum” is also an attack on the idea that teachers can be experts
in subject knowledge that is to be passed on. In this case, the alternative is the idea
that students should set the priorities for learning and that what is taught has to be “relevant”.

4) The Free Market Conspiracy. This is another argument from the left. The idea is that education is actually a fight between neo-liberals who wish to turn education into a business opportunity, and those who will resist these plots. Sometimes this is simply a form of denying 
the debate and discussion of progressive education is dismissed as irrelevant 
to the “real” political issue of creeping privatisation. We should be careful here to distinguish between opposing a specific market-oriented policy, say PFI for building schools 
or having private exam boards, and condemnation of a wider variety of non-progressive positions on education which have no, or only incidental, consequences for private companies. 
And it should definitely not be confused with wanting teachers to have better pay or working conditions. The argument is not about specific policies. It is a form of “virtue-signalling”, i.e. 
when people advance an opinion in order to show their own ideological credentials rather than because of the merits of the position. The virtuous left-winger is supporting progressive education out of high-minded, altruistic reasons, while only self-interested, right-wing conspirators (and their dupes) would support more traditional ideas.
Almost any traditionalist ideas in education can be condemned as part of
the neo-liberal conspiracy with enough ingenuity. Testing is really just a way of getting schools
to compete for market share. Criticism of progressive education is actually a way
of bashing teachers, in order to worsen their working conditions. Academic aims in education
are a way to prepare students for exploitation in the workplace. Traditional teaching methods
are a scam for making money for publishers. Nobody can actually prove they are not part
of the conspiracy, or at the very least, that they haven’t been fooled by the propaganda
of the conspirators. As with all conspiracy theories, it is usually impossible to persuade
the adherents that they are wrong with evidence. It doesn’t matter how far the Tories
move away from letting private companies run schools, or how many years they spend
in power without introducing it, it can always be claimed that is their ultimate goal.
It doesn’t matter that academy chains are charities, they are somehow private interests
looking to make money. It doesn’t matter that parents might not want their kids
to go to a particular school, the only reason parents may be given a choice between schools
is in order to create a market.  Sometimes the argument is then expanded to being one
about who should have power in education.
Apparently the only non “neo-liberal” way of running education is to put power
in the hands of local authority bureaucrats and educationalists in universities,
who conveniently, just happen to have been the traditional advocates of progressive education.
As I said last time, the four arguments in these two posts are not meant to be an exhaustive list
of the arguments for progressive education, nor even the most common, they are simply
the ones that seem to have become more common recently. As I also said, by not linking
to examples I am opening myself to claims of inventing straw men (although freeing myself
from those who want to quibble over interpretation of those examples), so I will just ask you
to watch out for them. If you see them, please feel free to provide links in the comments;
if you don’t, then I guess it doesn’t matter.


You can TCR software and engineering manuals for spontaneously recall – or pass that exam.
I can Turbo Charge Read a novel 6-7 times faster and remember what I’ve read.
I can TCR an instructional/academic book around 20 times faster and remember what I’ve read.
Introduction to Turbo Charged Reading YouTube
A practical overview of Turbo Charged Reading YouTube  
How to choose a book. A Turbo Charged Reading YouTube
Emotions when Turbo Charged Reading YouTube

Advanced Reading Skills Perhaps you’d like to join my FaceBook group ?

Perhaps you’d like to check out my sister blogs:
www.innermindworking.blogspot.com        gives many ways for you to work with the stresses of life
www.ourinnerminds.blogspot.com             take advantage of business experience and expertise.
www.happyartaccidents.blogspot.com       just for fun.

To quote the Dr Seuss himself, “The more that you read, the more things you will know.
The more that you learn; the more places you'll go.”

No comments:

Post a Comment

Your opinions, experience and questions are welcome. M'reen